Hakikat Asas Kepentingan Nasional dalam Perdagangan Internasional: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Implementasinya di Indonesia
Tinjauan Teoritis dan Implementasinya di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64147/dokhum.v1i2.9Kata Kunci:
Essence, National Interest, International Trade, ImplementationAbstrak
This research arises from the imbalance between the imperative to protect national interests and the demands of global market openness. It aims to examine the position of the principle of national interest as the foundational basis of Indonesian trade policy within the international legal framework. This study employs a normative juridical method using legislative and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that national interests encompass economic, political, social, and security dimensions; however, their implementation continues to face challenges in achieving harmonization with World Trade Organization rules. This study concludes that strengthening the domestic legal framework and enhancing the synchronization of national and international regulations are essential to ensuring the effectiveness of Indonesian trade policy.
Referensi
[1] N. D. Prasetyo, I. Istislam, and S. Hamidah, “erlindungan Kepentingan Nasional dalam Penanaman Modal,” J. Huk. dan Kenotariatan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 270–272, 2021, doi: 10.33474/hukeno.v5i2.10630.
[2] D. Agasie and R. Zubaedah, “Urgensi Kenaikan Tarif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Berdasarkan Asas Kepentingan Nasional,” Perspekt. Huk., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215–239, 2022, doi: 10.30649/ph.v22i2.131.
[3] A. Bainus and J. B. Rachman, “Editorial: Kepentingan Nasional dalam Hubungan Internasional,” Intermestic J. Int. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 2018, doi: 10.24198/intermestic.v2n2.1.
[4] S. Suparman, “Urgensi Regulasi Komprehensif E-Commerce di Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA),” J. Mercat., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75–90, 2015, doi: 10.31289/mercatoria.v8i1.648.
[5] A. Afifuddin and B. A. Saebani, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2012.
[6] K. Benuf and M. Azhar, “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer,” Gema Keadilan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 20–33, 2020, doi: 10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
[7] W. Suardi, “Catatan Kecil Mengenai Desain Riset Deskriptif Kualitatif,” Ekubis J. Ekon. Keuangan, Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.uninus.ac.id/EKUBIS/article/view/781
[8] N. Y. Puspita, E. Nadeak, and A. D. Hervino, “Justifikasi Penerapan Prinsip Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources dalam Perdagangan Internasional,” J. Komunitas Yust., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 504–525, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/56398
[9] C. D. P. Sari and H. Ibrahim, “Peran Politik dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Perdagangan Internasional: Studi Perbandingan Antara Negara Maju dan Negara Berkembang,” J. Minfo Polgan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2464–2473, 2023, doi: 10.33395/jmp.v12i2.13291.
[10] D. Suhanda, U. N. Huda, and U. Rosidin, “Politik Legislasi: Studi Terhadap Kepentingan Politik dalam Penetapan Regulasi di Indonesia,” Qanuniya J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 22–33, 2024, doi: 10.15575/qanuniya.v1i2.880.
[11] D. Listyarini, “Prismatika Nilai Ekonomi dan Nilai Kepentingan Sosial sebagai Dasar Kebijakan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,” Asy-Syir ah J. Ilmu Syari ah dan Huk., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 409–428, 2008, doi: 10.14421/ajish.v42i2.116.
[12] M. Rosyidin, “Intervensi Kemanusiaan dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional: Perdebatan Realis Versus Konstruktivis,” Glob. Strateg., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–73, 2017, doi: 10.20473/jgs.10.1.2016.55-73.
[13] S. D. Palabbi, “Ideologi dan Kepentingan Nasional Tiongkok di Balik Inisiatif One Belt and One Road (OBOR),” Governance, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/governance/article/view/52008
[14] N. Irfani, “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305–325, 2020, doi: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
[15] Z. Ridlwan, “Memelihara Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Atas Perjanjian Internasional: Telaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 33/PUU-IX/2011,” in Monograf: Dimensi Hukum Internasional, vol. 2, Lampung: Pusat Kajian Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung, 2014, pp. 75–94.
[16] A. Wibowo, Disrupsi Tata Kelola Global Ekonomi Digital. Semarang: Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://penerbit.stekom.ac.id/index.php/yayasanpat/article/view/592
[17] J. P. Suri, “Substantive V Exception Provision dalam Gatt: Studi Kasus Indonesia di WTO,” Coll. Stud. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 360–371, 2023, doi: 10.56301/csj.v6i2.1093.
[18] F. J. Priyono, “Prinsip Most Favoured Nations dan Pengecualiannya dalam World Trade Organization (WTO),” Masal. Huk., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 593–600, 2013, doi: 10.14710/mmh.42.4.2013.593-600.
[19] W. Carlsnaes, “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis,” Int. Stud. Q., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 245–270, 1992.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Enni Eka Kusumawati, Muh Amiruddin (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Scopus ID: 
