Prinsip Transparansi dalam Pengaturan Pemilihan Calon Hakim Konstitusi Oleh DPR Republik Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64147/dokhum.v1i2.13Kata Kunci:
Transparency Principle, Selection Process, House of RepresentativesAbstrak
This study is motivated by inconsistencies in the application of the principles of transparency, openness, and accountability in the selection process for Constitutional Court justices in Indonesia, which may affect judicial independence. It aims to examine the implementation of transparency and openness principles, analyze the authority of the House of Representatives (DPR) from institutional and checks-and-balances perspectives, and formulate an ideal regulatory model for the selection mechanism of constitutional justices. The research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches based on a literature review. The findings reveal a gap between legal norms and selection practices, fragmented procedures across institutions, and the potential politicization of authority that undermines institutional accountability. The study concludes that standardizing selection mechanisms grounded in substantive transparency, public participation, and strengthened procedural regulation is necessary to safeguard the integrity and independence of the Constitutional Court.
Referensi
[1] W. Wijayanti, N. Quraini M, and S. Putri R, “Transparansi dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Rekrutmen Calon Hakim Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 663–690, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php/jk/article/view/83
[2] M. Fajriyah, “Refraksi dan Alinasi Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 237–263, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php/jk/article/view/65
[3] I. Indramayu, J. Jayus, and R. Indrayati, “Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi,” e-Journal Lentera Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.5267.
[4] I. Rishan, “Redesain Sistem Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Hakim di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165–185, 2016, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art1.
[5] D. Syahputra and Z. Subaidi, “Kedudukan dan Mekanisme Pengisian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia,” Reusam J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 106–125, 2021, doi: 10.29103/reusam.v9i1.4979.
[6] M. F. F. Farabi and T. Tanaya, “Polemik Legalitas Pemecatan Hakim Konstitusi oleh Lembaga Pengusul: Tinjauan Kasus Pemecatan Hakim Aswanto dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” J. Huk. dan HAM Wara Sains, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 294–303, 2023, doi: 10.58812/jhhws.v2i04.291.
[7] M. B. Taufik, S. Sofyan, I. Al Haditzy, S. Sulfianah, and Z. Aulia, “Optimalisasi Proses Seleksi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Integritas Putusan Berkeadilan,” Qaumiyyah J. Huk. Tata Negara, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 2024, doi: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v5i1.147.
[8] I. G. Hamadi and F. Angelina, “Reformasi Sistem Rekrutmen Hakim Konstitusi Indonesia yang Sejalan dengan Nilai Kerakyatan Pancasila,” Ma’mal J. Lab. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 456–476, 2024, doi: 10.15642/mal.v5i5.417.
[9] I. S. Pangestu, D. Yuliani, and H. D. Dewi, “Rekonstruksi Mekanisme Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia,” J. Konstitusi Demokr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 106–123, 2025, doi: 10.7454/JKD.v5i1.1508.
[10] M. Ulum and A. Diniyanto, “Perbandingan Rekrutmen Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dengan Jerman,” Manabia J. Const. Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 201–216, 2024, doi: 10.28918/manabia.v4i02.9260.
[11] S. Engelmann, “Ending at the Beginning Law and Political Theory in ‘Pannomial Fragments,” in Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification, P. Schofield and X. Zhai, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 287–314.
[12] M. Kusnardi and B. R. Saragih, Susunan Pembagian Kekuasaan Menurut Sistem Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, 7th ed. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1994.
[13] T. T. Tutik, Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 194, 3rd ed. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2015.
[14] J. Asshiddiqie, Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara, 3rd ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.
[15] J. Asshiddiqie, Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru tentang Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics, 4th ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Andi Bau Medlin AR (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Scopus ID: 
