Membangun Budaya Hukum Nasional Melalui Putusan Hakim Yang Progresif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64147/dokhum.v1i1.1Keywords:
Legal culture, judicial decisions, progressive law, national lawAbstract
The legal culture of judges is significantly influenced by their approach to practicing law. Law is deeply intertwined with the dynamics of community life, not only to ensure legal certainty but also to promote justice and societal benefit. In law enforcement, it is essential to achieve legal certainty that is both fair and beneficial to all parties. This study employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive-prescriptive approach, which is primarily qualitative and utilizes deductive analysis. Law enforcement often prioritizes the substance and structure of the law while overlooking legal culture. However, without legal culture, the effective enforcement of law becomes challenging. Legal culture serves as the foundation for the application of positive law in society, as legal values are shaped by societal attitudes and perspectives. One crucial aspect of legal culture that requires reinforcement is the national legal culture, particularly through judicial decisions. Strengthening this aspect ensures that law functions as a tool for social engineering aligned with community values.
References
[1] K. Kaelan, “Peningkatan Integritas Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Melalui Kuliah Perdana,” Yogyakarta, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://law.ugm.ac.id/peningkatan-integritas-mahasiswa-pascasarjana-melalui-kuliah-perdana/
[2] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40464/uu-no-4-tahun-2004
[3] B. Siregar, Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Binacipta, 1983.
[4] N. R. Yunus, “Menciptakan Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Indonesia dalam Dimensi Hukum Progresif,” Supremasi Huk., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–57, 2015.
[5] F. Riza, “Budaya Hukum Masyarakat dalam menghadapi Corona Virus Disease Tahun 2019 (Covid-19),” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Edukasi Sosial dan Humaniora, Deli Serdang: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Amir Hamzah, 2021, pp. 445–453. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.53695/sintesa.v1i1.343
[6] D. Darmodiharjo and S. Shidarta, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, 6th ed. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.
[7] S. Rahardjo, Masalah Penegakan Hukum: Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.
[8] E. Warasih, Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosilogis. Semarang: PT. Suryandaru Utama, 2005.
[9] S. Istanto, Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Ganda, 2007.
[10] M. Schreier, M. Janssen, C. Stamann, A. Whittal, and T. Dahl, “Qualitative Content Analysis: Disciplinary Perspectives and Relationships between Methods—Introduction to the FQS Special Issue ‘Qualitative Content Analysis II,’” Forum Qual. Soc. Forsch., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3454/4547
[11] J. Hamidi, Hermeneutika Hukum: Sejarah, Filsafat, & Metode Tafsir. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2011.
[12] L. M. Friedman, Law and the Behavioral Sciences. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Herrillamp, 1969.
[13] D. S. Lev, “Judicial Institutions and Legal Culture in Indonesia,” in Culture and Politics in Indonesia, New York: Cornell University Press, 1972, pp. 246–318. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743900-010
[14] S. Rahardjo, Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 2018.
[15] T. R. R. Nitibaskara, Tegakkan Hukum Gunakan Hukum, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
[16] A. Saptomo, “Budaya Hukum Masyarakat yang Mendukung Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,” in Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan, 1st ed., H. Hermansyah, I. Imran, F. R. Hidayati, and D. Fedrian, Eds., Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2014, pp. 164–186.
[17] L. M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
[18] L. M. Friedman, American Law An Introduction, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2001.
[19] S. Ismantara, R. A. D. P. Sari, and C. Elvira, “Kajian Hukum Perikanan Sebagai Pendorong Potensi Budidaya Perikanan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal,” in Prosiding Seri Seminar Nasional (Serina III), Jakarta: Universitas Tarumanegara, 2021, pp. 335–346. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v1i1.16384
[20] R. Atmasasmita, Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2012.
[21] S. Arinanto and N. Triyanti, Memahami Hukum dari Konstruksi Sampai Implementasi, 1st ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009.
[22] A. Ibrahim, Merekonstruksi Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum & Hukum di Milenium Ketiga, 1st ed. Malang: Malang Institut for Strengthening Transition Society Studies, 2007.
[23] S. Rahardjo, Permasalahan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1983.
[24] R. Susskind, The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[25] J. Asshiddiqie, Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi: Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media dan HAM. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
[26] R. Cotterrell, “Law in Culture,” Ratio Juris, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00251.x.
[27] R. H. Soemitro, Studi Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Alumni, 1985.
[28] K. W. Saleh, Kehakiman dan Peradilan. Jakarta: Simbur Cahaya, 1976.
[29] A. Sudirman, Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya: Suatu Pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
[30] M. M. Mahmodin, Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Markham Faried (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Scopus ID: 
